We ran Adviora on Adviora: the fix list, the packs, what moved

This is a log, not a launch. Every row below is tagged with its source and date, and the mistakes come before the wins. These are the numbers from our 15 October 2026 review. The Baseline Audit run on Day 8 is the official before-state, and where it differs from the table, the Day 8 figure wins.

We followed the Phase 1 order. Each step matches the Action Pack that covers the same scope, at its fixed price:

1. Broken links, 301s, robots.txt groups and the demo mirror. AI Crawler Access and Technical Fix, $650 / ₹22,000.
2. Structured data. Schema Markup Implementation, $650 / ₹22,000.
3. /about entity details and real bylines. E-E-A-T and Trust Foundation, $750 / ₹25,000.
4. The audit itself. Baseline Audit, $750 / ₹22,000.

Our own team did the work in-house. These are the prices a customer pays for the same scope.

Two mistakes we are showing

• The robots.txt group error. A Disallow line for thin URLs joined the wrong group, and the file carried contradictory signals.
• Spam-domain backlinks. We did not buy them, and we do not know where they came from. Google's links report shows 6 linking sites and none of the spam domains, so there is no disavow to report. We did not disavow anything.

For how we order fixes in general, read how to improve AI search visibility: what to fix first.

Every cell stays blank until the figure has been measured and dated. The targets in our plan never appear in this table.

Besides the audit, we run the whole platform on our own domain, adviora.ai: per-market AI visibility, share of voice, the citation placement map and the content gap. Each row below is filled in only when it has been measured, with its date, the engines and the number of runs per prompt. Mention, citation, recommendation and click are reported separately, per engine, and never as one blended score. Prompts come from the site's messaging, what Google shows and People Also Ask questions, as on our methodology page.

Read AI visibility tracking for how the first two work and AI citation tracking for the placement map. The placement map and content gap are what turn the numbers above into a to-do list; they are not a result by themselves.

Does Adviora now appear in third-party tool lists?

At baseline, no: adviora.ai was in none of about 40 third-party "best AI visibility tools" listicles and review videos that the engines cited (panel, 15 October 2026). We will report whether that has changed, by naming each list we are now on, and we will not count a list that we paid for or that does not disclose our affiliation. Today the answer is: not yet measured.

We write this section after Day 53, from the rows that stayed flat: one likely reason for each, and the date we will re-check it. Until the Day 45 and Day 53 readings exist, we have nothing to report here, and we are not guessing.

The remaining top-10 fixes from the audit, and the citation-gap plan from the panel: getting named on the independent listicles, review sites and videos that engines already cite, with our affiliation disclosed and no paid inclusion. We are not promising dates.

• Panel: 22 buyer prompts across Google AI Overviews (stored answers) and ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude (API samples). 15 unbranded cells were checked in the first run, and 135 of 154 cells were not yet checked. One run is a sample, and API answers are not consumer-app answers.
• Search Console window: 13 August to 13 October 2026 for the before state; the Day 53 read will state its own window.
• Full platform run: engines, markets and runs per prompt are stated beside each figure when it is measured. The free audit covers ChatGPT, Gemini, DeepSeek and Perplexity; a free trial or paid plan covers six AI engines plus Google AI Overviews.
• Limits: we cannot show cause and effect for any single fix, and we cannot see AI influence that never produces a visit or a link.

No one can promise what AI engines say about a brand, and this log does not.